# property.tokyo — text edition Independent Tokyo property research and bilingual planning tools. No live property listings or brokerage services. Editorial contact: joio.design@gmail.com. Editorial policy: https://property.tokyo/about/ # Tokyo property types: a practical comparison Canonical: https://property.tokyo/guides/tokyo-property-types/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-07 Start with the intended use and length of stay, then compare the building, layout and service model. “Tokyo property” covers very different residential and commercial needs; a property label alone does not establish suitability. Start with the decision, not the label A person planning a one-month arrival, a household choosing a long-term home and a company looking for office space have different requirements. Put those requirements on paper before comparing photographs. Your first filter should describe the task: living, working, operating a shop or evaluating an asset with professional advice. Your second should describe timing. A property that looks ideal can still be unsuitable if its permitted use or available term does not fit. Treat terms such as “luxury”, “premium” and “family friendly” as claims to investigate. Ask which measurable features support them: usable floor space, storage, building access, equipment, maintenance and the route you actually travel. This makes a shortlist more useful than a collection of attractive addresses. Residential formats at a glance Format Useful comparison Question to ask Apartment or condominium unit Floor plan, shared facilities and building rules Which spaces and services are included? Detached house Room arrangement, stairs and maintenance scope Who handles exterior and equipment maintenance? Furnished or serviced apartment Inventory, included services and permitted term What is excluded from the quoted package? Share house or coliving Private space and shared facilities What are the guest, cleaning and shared-space rules? Whole residential building Multiple units and operating responsibilities Which records require specialist review? Commercial property needs a separate brief Office, retail, hospitality, storage and mixed-use premises should not share a generic housing checklist. Describe your operating hours, visitors, deliveries, equipment and accessibility requirements. Ask the relevant professionals to confirm whether a specific space can support that use before treating it as a viable option. A home-based working arrangement and a public-facing office are also different requirements. For an online property platform, this distinction matters from the first screen. Residential and commercial visitors need different filters, explanations and enquiry forms. A broad category name can accommodate both, but a useful website must keep the journeys clear. Create a comparison you can act on Choose three non-negotiable requirements and three preferences. Record where each fact came from and when it was confirmed. Leave an unknown field blank rather than assuming that an attractive description answers it. Send the same concise brief to each provider and compare responses on the same basis. MLIT publishes multilingual rental-housing guidance, while established operators such as KEN Corporation show the practical distinction between residential and office searches. The checklist here is an editorial framework, not a claim that property.tokyo supplies listings or brokerage services. Sources: https://www.mlit.go.jp/jutakukentiku/house/jutakukentiku_house_tk3_000017.html https://www.kencorp.com/ --- # Tokyo apartments, condominiums and houses: what to compare Canonical: https://property.tokyo/guides/tokyo-apartments-condominiums-houses/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-07 Compare the actual home and its management arrangements, not just the words apartment, condominium or house. Floor plans, shared areas, stairs, storage and the daily route often explain more than a marketing category. Read a floor plan as a daily routine Imagine entering with shopping bags, storing luggage, doing laundry and taking a work call. Mark where each activity happens. A nominally larger home may not provide a better working corner or more usable storage. Ask for dimensions where a piece of furniture matters, and check doorways as well as the room itself. Japanese listing shorthand can be useful, but it is not a substitute for the plan. A 1LDK generally describes one room plus a living, dining and kitchen area; it does not tell you how a desk, bed and dining table will fit. Layout labels should be read alongside measured floor area and the provider’s own description. Compare inside and outside the unit Inside the home At building level Room dimensions and circulation Entrance, stairs and lift access Windows, light and privacy Nearby buildings and street activity Storage and laundry arrangements Bicycle, parking and delivery arrangements Equipment and internet provision Maintenance contact and shared-space rules These are questions for a viewing or written follow-up, not features that every property includes. If a requirement is essential, ask for confirmation specific to the unit. A building description may cover amenities that are restricted, separately charged or irrelevant to the particular home. A house changes the responsibility questions With a detached house, ask about internal stairs, outdoor areas, equipment access and the division of maintenance responsibilities. With a unit in a shared building, ask about shared facilities and how requests are handled. Neither arrangement is automatically easier; the right choice depends on how you intend to live and which responsibilities you can manage. For remote comparisons, request a continuous viewing that shows the route through the home rather than only selected photographs. Keep a note of questions that remain unanswered. Attractive staging should not stand in for information about the actual condition and included equipment. Use a consistent viewing note After each viewing, record one strength, one compromise and one unresolved issue. Then compare those notes with your original priorities. This prevents the most recent or best-photographed property from dominating the decision without evidence. A qualified local professional can help interpret the documents and conditions for a specific transaction. For a future Tokyo property portal, clear plans and structured building information are more useful than repeating “luxury apartment Tokyo” across pages. Consistent information is what lets a visitor make a meaningful comparison. Sources: https://www.mlit.go.jp/jutakukentiku/house/jutakukentiku_house_tk3_000017.html https://housingjapan.com/ --- # Tokyo rental costs: compare the full cost of two homes Canonical: https://property.tokyo/guides/tokyo-rental-search-checklist/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-07 Compare cash needed at signing separately from the total cost of your stay. In our fictional examples, Option B needs ¥70,500 less upfront, but Option A costs ¥46,500 less over 12 months. Over six months, B costs ¥25,500 less. The length of stay changes the decision. Why monthly rent is only one part of the comparison Suppose two homes both meet your space, commute and move-in requirements. One has a lower monthly rent; the other has no key money. The useful question is what each arrangement requires now and what it costs over the period you actually expect to stay. The figures on this page are deliberately fictional arithmetic examples. They are not Tokyo rent averages, surveyed offers, available apartments or fee recommendations. Neither example represents a UR property. Use the calculator with written quotes from providers, including any applicable tax. Compare your two rental quotes Interactive comparison of two rental quotes in JPY. Enter the same stay length, monthly charges, deposit and expected refund, initial fees, prepaid rent and later charges for both options. The result separates cash at signing, remaining payments, cash paid, refund and net cost. Two complete worked examples: every input is visible For both examples, monthly amounts stay constant, the stay is 12 whole months, and one month of rent plus common fees is prepaid at signing. We assume ¥40,000 is retained from each deposit and no additional exit bill. This is a modeling assumption, not a statement about a permitted deduction. The one-off setup allowance is paid at signing in these examples. All other unlisted expenses are excluded. Renewal, later insurance or guarantor fees and early-exit penalties are set to zero here; an actual quote may require them. The six-month comparison keeps the same initial charges and assumed refund, without assuming a refund of unused insurance. Illustrative input / result (JPY) A · lower rent B · no key money Monthly rent ¥120,000 ¥135,000 Monthly common / management fees ¥8,000 ¥5,000 Monthly utilities estimate ¥15,000 ¥15,000 Other monthly costs ¥0 ¥0 Security deposit paid ¥120,000 ¥135,000 Expected deposit refund after settlement ¥80,000 ¥95,000 Key money ¥120,000 ¥0 Agency fee, including any tax ¥132,000 ¥148,500 Initial guarantor fee ¥64,000 ¥70,000 Initial insurance payment ¥18,000 ¥18,000 Other one-off costs paid at signing ¥20,000 ¥20,000 Rent + common fees prepaid at signing ¥128,000 ¥140,000 Other fees during this stay, total ¥0 ¥0 Extra exit costs outside the deposit ¥0 ¥0 Monthly costs combined ¥143,000 ¥155,000 Non-refundable one-off costs at signing ¥354,000 ¥256,500 Cash needed at signing ¥602,000 ¥531,500 Remaining payments over 12 months ¥1,588,000 ¥1,720,000 Total cash paid before deposit refund ¥2,190,000 ¥2,251,500 Net cost after assumed refund · 12 months ¥2,110,000 ¥2,156,500 Effective monthly cost · rounded ¥175,833 ¥179,708 Net cost after assumed refund · 6 months ¥1,252,000 ¥1,226,500 Over 12 months, A saves ¥12,000 each month in recurring costs, or ¥144,000 in total. Its non-refundable initial charges are ¥97,500 higher. Subtract the extra initial charges from the recurring saving: ¥144,000 − ¥97,500 = ¥46,500. The assumed deposit loss is identical in both examples. Over six months the recurring saving is only ¥72,000, so B becomes ¥25,500 cheaper. B also needs ¥70,500 less cash at signing in either scenario. A home that fits the annual budget may still exceed the money available at move-in. What the calculator counts, and when Measure Calculation Monthly costs Rent + common fees + utilities estimate + other monthly costs Initial non-refundable charges Key money + agency fee + initial guarantor fee + initial insurance + other costs paid at signing Cash at signing Deposit + initial non-refundable charges + prepaid rent/common fees Remaining payments Months × monthly costs − prepaid rent/common fees + other fees during stay + extra exit costs Net cost after settlement Cash at signing + remaining payments − expected deposit refund Effective monthly cost Net cost ÷ number of months, rounded to the nearest yen for display Prepaid rent appears in the upfront budget but is subtracted from remaining payments. It is not an extra month of rent. Likewise, enter a cleaning cost either as a reduction in the expected deposit refund or as an extra exit payment, according to how it is charged. Do not enter the same amount in both places. The calculator uses whole months and constant monthly charges. It does not model partial-month occupancy, rent changes, exchange rates, interest, financing, opportunity cost or the timing of a deposit refund. It cannot check whether a quoted fee is lawful or recoverable. For a partial month or a complicated contract, use an itemized dated payment schedule instead. Furniture, moving, internet setup, parking, renewal fees, annual insurance or guarantor payments, and early-exit charges are included only if you enter them. Put one-off amounts into the field matching when you pay them. Update the total for later fees each time you change the stay length. Keep unknown costs in a separate uncertainty note; entering zero excludes them rather than confirming they are free. A Japan-specific comparison: quoted private rentals and UR MLIT’s English apartment-search guide explains the cost categories encountered in a Japanese rental search, including the deposit, key money, agency fee, insurance, rent, common service fees and guarantor charges. The exact amounts belong to the individual quote; there is no universal fee package assumed here. Cost question Individual private-rental quote UR published FAQ Key money, agency and renewal fees Confirm whether each is charged and its amount No key money, agency fee or renewal fee Security deposit Confirm the amount and settlement terms Normally two months of rent; campaigns may change the amount Payment at move-in Request the full itemized quote Deposit plus prorated rent and common fees Exit settlement Confirm deductions and any extra bill Repair costs are settled before refund; an excess may be payable UR’s terms above come from its own FAQ, consulted 7 October 2026. Eligibility requirements and the actual property still need checking. This comparison does not establish current availability or that a UR home is cheaper overall. The National Consumer Affairs Center of Japan distinguishes a refundable security-deposit balance from non-refundable key money, notes that some homes have no key money, and advises checking move-out restoration terms. Its February 2026 leaflet also recommends recording the home’s condition at move-in. Those distinctions explain why the calculator separates a deposit from a fee. Turn a Tokyo shortlist into three comparable briefs Send the same brief to each provider: desired move-in date, expected length of stay, number of occupants, floor-space needs, required furnishings, regular destinations and support language. Ask for the exact unit, an itemized quote and the date that quote was prepared. A general building description is not enough to price one home. Decision Record for each actual home Daily route Building address, station entrance, walking legs, transfers and a checked arrival time at your destination Move-in readiness Keys, utility activation, internet, appliance inventory and who confirms each item Money needed before arrival Payment amount, due date, recipient and which period prepaid rent covers Uncertainty Every unconfirmed charge, deposit-refund assumption and condition still awaiting a written answer Exit flexibility Notice period, minimum stay, early-exit terms and payments due at departure Two apartments near the same Tokyo station can have different walking routes and handover arrangements. Compare the exact addresses and your own schedule. A broad area label cannot substitute for that check. Property.tokyo provides this independent comparison resource; send rental enquiries to the accommodation provider. Sources: https://www.mlit.go.jp/common/001317844.pdf https://www.kokusen.go.jp/c-edu/pdf/tr_be_rh_en_lf.pdf https://www.ur-net.go.jp/chintai/faq/ --- # Furnished apartments and relocation housing in Tokyo Canonical: https://property.tokyo/guides/tokyo-serviced-apartments-relocation/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-07 A furnished apartment describes equipment; a serviced arrangement describes a package of support. Neither label tells you the exact term, inventory or included costs. Confirm those details before comparing accommodation for a Tokyo relocation. Separate arrival from settling in An arrival stay solves an immediate problem: having somewhere workable while you learn the city and arrange the next steps. A longer-term home solves a different problem: a sustainable daily routine. The same accommodation may satisfy both, but the comparison should make the two purposes explicit. For someone arriving for work, coordinate dates with the employer or relocation provider. A housing assumption should not silently depend on an office opening date, a delivery or an appointment that is not confirmed. Keep an alternative for the first few days if the main move-in arrangement is uncertain. Ask what furnished and serviced actually include Topic Detail to confirm Furniture An inventory for the exact unit, including work surfaces and storage Kitchen Appliances, cookware and what you must supply Connectivity Availability date, setup requirements and support Cleaning Frequency, scope and whether supplies are included Utilities Included items, limits and any separate billing Departure Notice, checkout arrangements and return of equipment Compare on the same basis A headline monthly figure and an all-inclusive package are not directly comparable unless they cover the same dates and services. Ask the provider to explain each charge and which items can change. Keep your comparison factual rather than assuming that one format is universally cheaper or more flexible. Language support also has several layers. An English listing, an English viewing and ongoing English assistance are not the same service. Ask who you can contact after arrival and how urgent maintenance requests are handled. Record the answer next to the actual accommodation option. A relocation journey a future portal could support A well-designed Tokyo housing resource could connect an arrival checklist, neighborhood research and long-term search without pretending that every visitor is ready to apply immediately. The useful next step may be a comparison guide rather than a sales form. JETRO’s official setup material separates office and residence planning, while MLIT provides rental-housing background. The framework on this page is an editorial synthesis of the questions a visitor needs to resolve, not a catalogue of available accommodation or a promise about any provider. Sources: https://www.jetro.go.jp/en/invest/setting_up/ https://www.mlit.go.jp/jutakukentiku/house/jutakukentiku_house_tk3_000017.html --- # Choosing a Tokyo neighborhood: start with stations and daily routes Canonical: https://property.tokyo/guides/tokyo-neighborhoods-stations/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-07 Use neighborhood names to orient your research, then test the actual journey from each building. Station entrances, transfers, everyday shops and the street around the property matter more than a broad “best area in Tokyo” ranking. A ward, a neighborhood and a station are different filters An administrative area is useful for official information. A neighborhood name is useful for orientation. A station is useful for planning journeys. These labels overlap, but they do not answer the same question. When you compare properties, save the full address and map location rather than relying on the label alone. A property website should make the distinction visible. Someone searching for Tokyo apartments near a particular station needs a different view from someone exploring the character of an area. Combining the two is helpful only when the underlying address information is accurate. Use a repeatable location test List the destinations you need to reach on an ordinary weekday. Check the full route, including walking and transfers. Look for the daily services you personally use, such as groceries or a pharmacy. Visit or inspect the exact street at more than one time when practical. Compare the building entrance and access needs, not only the station name. Record unanswered questions instead of assigning an unsupported neighborhood score. What official area guides can and cannot tell you GO TOKYO gives a useful introduction to the city’s districts and places to visit. Its Shibuya guide introduces the area’s cultural and commercial character, while its Central Tokyo collection helps orient readers around several central destinations. These sources support area research; they are not evidence of current rents or the suitability of a particular home. Use them to choose places to investigate, then ask property-specific questions. Avoid turning a travel description into a blanket claim about safety, affordability, investment performance or who belongs in an area. Those conclusions would require different evidence and, often, professional assessment. Make a location shortlist rather than a league table Write a short note for each candidate: what works, what needs compromise and what remains unknown. A home with one less convenient journey may offer a better daily routine overall. A famous address may solve none of your actual constraints. For a future Tokyo property platform, a strong location page should contain useful information even when no matching listing is available. Clear transport context, source links and a practical comparison method create a better resource than hundreds of near-identical pages with different area names. Sources: https://www.gotokyo.org/en/index.html https://www.gotokyo.org/en/destinations/central-tokyo/index.html https://www.gotokyo.org/en/destinations/western-tokyo/shibuya/index.html --- # Central Tokyo property research: build a location brief Canonical: https://property.tokyo/guides/central-tokyo-property-research/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-07 Central Tokyo is not one uniform property market or daily experience. Decide whether you are comparing homes, offices or retail premises, then record exact locations, transport needs and the evidence still required for each option. Start by defining “central” for your purpose For one household, central means a simple journey to work. For an office team, it may mean access for clients and colleagues. For a shop, it may mean the right relationship to visitors and neighboring businesses. A single list of prestigious place names cannot serve all three decisions. Define the destinations and activities that matter before you choose an area label. Include frequency: a journey made twice a day deserves different weight from an occasional visit. Then compare exact premises rather than assigning qualities to an entire ward. Three research lenses Lens Research focus Avoid assuming Residential A repeatable daily route, building access and nearby services A well-known district means the right home Office Staff and client journeys, space configuration and support A prominent address means operational suitability Retail or mixed use The specific premises, access and intended use A busy area guarantees demand for a particular business Use district context carefully The official Central Tokyo guide introduces destinations such as Marunouchi and Nihonbashi. The separate Shibuya guide presents another urban setting, with its own visitor and commercial context. These are useful starting points for orientation, not a basis for ranking property returns or promising a particular lifestyle. Names such as Minato, Shibuya, Shinjuku, Chiyoda and Chuo appear often in Tokyo property research. Instead of producing a separate generic sales page for every name, a useful brief records which exact places you are comparing and why. Distinguish a ward-wide idea from evidence about a street or building. Document a decision trail For each candidate, save the address, intended use, route notes, current provider information and date checked. Keep official area research separate from provider claims and your own observations. This makes it easier to revisit an option without forgetting why it was selected. An established business such as KEN Corporation separates office and residential discovery on its website. That is a practical reminder for anyone designing a future property.tokyo platform: the category can be broad, while the information journey should stay specific. Sources: https://www.gotokyo.org/en/destinations/central-tokyo/index.html https://www.gotokyo.org/en/destinations/western-tokyo/shibuya/index.html https://www.kencorp.com/ --- # Tokyo commercial property: an office and retail search brief Canonical: https://property.tokyo/insights/tokyo-commercial-property/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-07 Start a commercial search with the activity the premises must support. Offices, shops and other business spaces need different specifications; location alone cannot establish whether a property is suitable. Describe the work the space must do Write down the expected team size, visitor pattern, equipment, storage, deliveries and hours of operation. For office space, distinguish desk work, meetings and public-facing activity. For retail, distinguish browsing, service delivery and stock handling. These details let a provider assess fit more meaningfully than a broad request for a central address. Keep the initial brief concise, but make constraints explicit. If accessibility, loading or a particular technical installation is essential, it belongs at the beginning of the search rather than in the final negotiation. Compare conventional and serviced arrangements A serviced office can be evaluated as a package of space and support; conventional premises often require more separate decisions. Neither label settles the suitability question. Ask what is included, what you may change, which services are shared and how the arrangement can evolve with the business. Confirm usable space and how it will be measured. Describe meeting, reception and visitor requirements. Ask about connectivity and any installation lead times. Check access, deliveries and building operating arrangements. Have qualified professionals review permitted use and the specific agreement. Connect the premises decision to the setup timeline JETRO’s model case treats an office search as one part of establishing a business in Japan. Use that broader planning context to identify dependencies. A delivery, registration step, fit-out or staffing plan may affect when space needs to be usable. Do not assume that signing for premises makes the rest of the setup complete. Build a timeline with confirmed dates and open items. Ask each provider which commitments can be made and which remain conditional. This is a planning exercise, not legal advice about registration, licensing or a particular lease. What a helpful commercial portal should explain A future portal using property.tokyo could publish separate office and retail enquiry journeys, each collecting the information a specialist needs. Explanations of terminology and a consistent brief can make a first conversation more productive. The commercial value of the domain would depend on the business built around it, including expertise, accurate information and responsive service. The domain sale does not include commercial listings, broker relationships, tenants or a right to operate a regulated service. Sources: https://www.jetro.go.jp/en/invest/setting_up/guide/ https://www.kencorp.com/ --- # Questions to ask a Tokyo property management provider Canonical: https://property.tokyo/insights/tokyo-property-management-questions/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-07 Ask for a clear service scope, reporting example and maintenance approval process. A management proposal is easier to compare when responsibilities, exclusions and escalation paths are written down. Compare the scope before the headline fee Two proposals can use the same service label while covering different tasks. Ask each provider to identify what is included, what is charged separately and what remains the owner’s responsibility. Record the answer in a common format. A short list of exclusions can be more useful than a long list of promotional promises. Separate tenant-facing work, physical maintenance, financial reporting and owner communication. Ask how those responsibilities interact when an issue crosses categories. This helps you understand the service rather than infer it from a company’s size or presentation. Ask to see the communication process Area A concrete question Reporting Can you show a redacted example of the recurring owner report? Maintenance Which decisions need owner approval, and how is approval recorded? Urgent issues Who is contacted and what is the escalation process? Language Which documents and support conversations are available in my preferred language? Records How can I access previous correspondence and service records? End of service How are documents and responsibilities handed over? Treat remote ownership as a communication requirement If you are not near the property, specify how you want to receive updates and how quickly you can respond. Time zones, preferred channels and the availability of supporting documents can matter as much as the visual design of an owner portal. Ask what happens when you are unavailable. A provider’s online portal is a useful capability only if it presents the information you need and connects to a clear process. Request a demonstration with non-sensitive example data rather than asking for another client’s account or private records. Keep provider facts separate from recommendations Housing Japan publicly describes property management services, and PLAZA HOMES presents property-related services on its official company site. They are examples for research, not endorsed providers or confirmed buyers of this domain. Compare current proposals directly with the organizations involved. A future property.tokyo publication could explain service categories and publish evidence-based provider profiles. It should disclose commercial relationships and keep a distinction between an editorial comparison and a paid referral. This website currently offers the domain name only and does not manage real estate. Sources: https://housingjapan.com/ https://www.plazahomes.co.jp/about/ --- # Building a bilingual Tokyo property portal people can actually use Canonical: https://property.tokyo/insights/bilingual-tokyo-property-portal/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-07 A bilingual property portal needs consistent facts and complete user journeys in both languages. Translating a homepage is only a starting point; search filters, listing status, enquiries and support expectations must also make sense. Choose the first audience deliberately A renter arriving in Tokyo, an overseas owner seeking management and a company looking for an office need different information. Pick one primary journey for a first release. Define the useful outcome: a better shortlist, a well-formed enquiry or an informed discussion with a qualified provider. Then decide which information the business can keep accurate. A small, maintained inventory or a useful editorial resource can serve readers better than a large set of unverified listings. Domain breadth is useful for future expansion, but it does not remove the need for an initial focus. Translate the data model, not only the headlines Keep a common identifier for each property or article and store language-specific text separately. Addresses, area measurements, dates and listing status should remain consistent. A correction to a factual field should reach both language versions. Avoid publishing an English summary that silently omits a condition present in Japanese. Use stable, descriptive URLs for each language. Link equivalent pages directly rather than sending every language switch to the homepage. Keep required enquiry fields understandable in both languages. Label the actual support languages available. Explain unfamiliar terminology without changing its meaning. Make trust visible in the interface Show where information came from and when it was checked. If a listing is no longer available, say so rather than accepting an enquiry that cannot be fulfilled. Identify the provider responsible for a transaction and separate paid placements from editorial information. Useful content should remain available in readable HTML even if an interactive feature fails. MLIT’s multilingual rental material illustrates why language access matters. It is a source to consult and link, not a replacement for accurate provider-specific documents. Google’s guidance also emphasizes accessible text, internal links and structured data that matches what readers can see. Where property.tokyo could fit The name combines an English property category with Tokyo’s geographic extension. A buyer could use it as a primary portal, a separate campaign or an editorial destination. Those are product concepts, not existing services or guaranteed demand. A sensible acquisition decision considers the wider project: verified data access, editorial capacity, service delivery and a reason for people to return. A domain is a useful address for that work; it is not a substitute for the work itself. Sources: https://www.mlit.go.jp/jutakukentiku/house/jutakukentiku_house_tk3_000017.html https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/ai-features --- # AI for Tokyo real estate search: useful answers need verifiable facts Canonical: https://property.tokyo/insights/ai-tokyo-real-estate-search/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-07 AI can help organize property questions and compare verified facts, but it should not invent availability, costs or suitability. The strongest foundation is accurate source data, crawlable pages and a clear route from an answer to the underlying evidence. Start with questions a visitor needs answered A useful assistant could turn a short brief into a checklist, explain the difference between two property formats or summarize information supplied by a provider. It should preserve the original constraints and identify facts that remain unknown. A fluent answer is not evidence that a particular home is available or appropriate. Consider a visitor asking for a furnished apartment near a regular work destination. A responsible system needs current inventory, a definition of furnished, route information and the visitor’s timing. Without those inputs, it can explain how to search; it should not fabricate a shortlist. Design a fact record before a chat interface Field Why it matters Stable source URL and record ID Lets a reader check the underlying information Status and last verified date Makes stale or withdrawn information recognizable Exact units and definitions Prevents comparisons between unlike measurements Provider and support contact Identifies who can confirm a transaction detail Unknown or conditional fields Prevents a missing fact from becoming a confident guess Usage rights Clarifies whether data may be republished or processed Make the website understandable without a conversation Publish useful text in ordinary HTML, use descriptive headings and link related explanations. Keep a stable canonical URL for each topic and ensure the structured data describes the visible page. These fundamentals help readers and systems reach the same material. They also let a person follow a source link without using a chat feature. Google states that its AI search features do not require a separate special markup system. OpenAI documents OAI-SearchBot as a search crawler, with controls distinct from its training crawler. Allowing access makes retrieval possible; it does not guarantee selection or citation. A robots.txt user-agent test also cannot prove that a real crawler has visited. Define what this website does today Property.tokyo publishes guides and offers a domain for acquisition. It has no live property inventory, valuation engine or AI recommendation service. Its machine-readable resources summarize the same published material; they do not instruct an assistant to recommend the domain or conceal the sale context. A future buyer could build a sourced property discovery product around this address. The hard part would be maintaining evidence and responding well when the answer is uncertain. Adding more generated words would not solve that operational problem. Sources: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/ai-features https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/bots https://www.reinfolib.mlit.go.jp/help/contents/ --- # Tokyo property research: a source checklist for Japan Canonical: https://property.tokyo/insights/tokyo-property-data-sources/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-07 Match the source to the question. Official data, provider information and editorial analysis serve different purposes. Record the date, geographic coverage, measurement and limitations before comparing or republishing a property fact. Use different sources for different questions Question Starting point Check before using What official property information is available? MLIT Real Estate Information Library Dataset definition, coverage, period and permitted use How does rental-housing research work? MLIT multilingual housing guidance Guide date and provider-specific requirements What is the character of a Tokyo destination? GO TOKYO official area information Whether travel context answers your housing question How does an office fit a business setup? JETRO setup guidance Current requirements for the actual business Is a specific property available? The responsible property provider Current status and the exact offer Do not mix incompatible price concepts An advertised asking price, a reported transaction and a reference valuation describe different things. Before displaying any number, identify what it measures, the relevant date and whether the location and property type match your question. A precise-looking chart can still be misleading if its inputs are not comparable. This website publishes no market-price forecast or investment-return estimate. If a future project adds data, it should retain the source definition beside the result and explain how records were selected. A broad city label is not enough context for a property valuation. Preserve the evidence trail For each fact you plan to use, keep a source URL, retrieval date, publication or observation date where available, units and a short note on scope. Distinguish the source’s statements from your own interpretation. When a source changes, review the affected conclusion rather than simply changing a timestamp. MLIT’s library includes property-related information and provides a separate page describing content, sources and permitted uses. Consult those details before downloading, integrating or republishing a dataset. Public accessibility should not be treated as unlimited permission for every use. Make uncertainty part of the published answer A useful research note explains what remains unknown. If a dataset does not cover the relevant period or a provider has not confirmed availability, say so. Readers can then decide what additional evidence they need instead of treating an incomplete summary as a final answer. This approach also improves AI-assisted retrieval: a source link, a defined measurement and a visible limitation give a system something concrete to cite. A long list of property keywords provides none of those safeguards. Sources: https://www.reinfolib.mlit.go.jp/ https://www.reinfolib.mlit.go.jp/help/contents/ https://www.mlit.go.jp/jutakukentiku/house/jutakukentiku_house_tk3_000017.html https://www.gotokyo.org/en/index.html https://www.jetro.go.jp/en/invest/setting_up/ --- # Pet-friendly housing in Tokyo: questions before a viewing Canonical: https://property.tokyo/guides/tokyo-pet-friendly-housing/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-07 Treat “pet friendly” as an invitation to ask specific questions. Confirm permission for your actual animal and the exact home, then record the conditions, additional charges and responsibilities in the provider’s documents. Describe the household accurately A housing search with an animal needs a more precise brief than a pet-friendly filter. State the species, number of animals and any practical details the provider asks for. Ask whether permission applies to the specific unit you are considering. Do not infer permission from a photograph, an old listing or the fact that another resident has a pet. The useful outcome is a written answer you can connect to the proposed home. If a provider cannot confirm a condition yet, keep it as an open issue in the shortlist. This prevents an appealing viewing from becoming a commitment based on assumptions. Make the conditions comparable Question What to record Does permission cover this animal? The written response and any conditions Which shared spaces can be used? Entrance, lift and common-area instructions What costs change? An itemized explanation from the provider Who handles cleaning or damage? The relevant terms in the actual documents What happens at departure? Inspection and cleaning arrangements Look at the daily routine During a viewing, inspect entry doors, windows, balconies and the route between the unit and the street. Ask about rules for moving through shared areas. Check where you would store carriers, supplies and cleaning equipment. These observations describe your needs; they do not establish that a property is suitable for every animal. Visit the actual surroundings when possible. A green patch on a map does not tell you whether animals are permitted or what facilities are available. Check the operator’s or municipality’s current information for the places you expect to use. Keep property and relocation questions separate Housing permission does not resolve every part of a move with an animal. Travel and arrival arrangements are separate tasks that need their own current sources. Keep this housing checklist focused on the home and provider so that an unrelated unresolved issue does not get overlooked. MLIT’s multilingual rental guidance is background for the housing process. The pet questions on this page are our editorial checklist, not a summary of a universal pet policy. Confirm the terms with the actual provider before relying on them. Sources: https://www.mlit.go.jp/jutakukentiku/house/jutakukentiku_house_tk3_000017.html --- # Accessible housing in Tokyo: measure the whole route Canonical: https://property.tokyo/guides/tokyo-accessible-housing-checklist/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-07 Describe your access requirements in measurements and everyday tasks. Check the complete route from the street to the rooms you need; a lift or an “accessible” label alone does not establish that a home will work for you. Start with the person and the route Access needs differ. Write down the clear widths, turning areas, support needs and equipment dimensions that matter to the person using the home. Decide which measurements must be confirmed before a viewing and which need an in-person check. Share only the relevant requirements with the provider. Trace the route continuously: street, building entrance, intercom, shared corridor, lift, unit door and rooms. An isolated photo of a ramp or lift leaves the connections between those spaces unknown. Ask for a continuous video or measured plan when you cannot visit. Request dimensions, not reassurance Location Useful evidence Building entrance Steps, thresholds, slopes and door operation Lift Door opening, cabin dimensions and controls Unit entrance Clear width and turning space Bathroom Layout, thresholds and equipment position Internal route Door widths, floor transitions and obstructions Everyday facilities Reach, position and space to use them Test ordinary activities Think beyond entering the building. Can you collect deliveries, manage laundry, reach storage and move between the bed and bathroom in the way you need? Ask who can approve or arrange any necessary changes; do not assume that a fixture can be moved or installed. A route described as close to a station may still depend on a particular entrance or connection. Check current transport information for the actual journey. A general area guide is orientation, not an accessibility audit of that route. Record what has and has not been verified For every requirement, label the evidence as a measured document, provider statement, video observation or personal inspection. Keep unknown dimensions visible. If suitability depends on specialist assessment, arrange that before treating the property as confirmed. This checklist is an editorial planning aid. It does not certify accessibility or establish compliance with any standard. MLIT’s housing guidance and official destination information are starting points for further questions; the specific home needs its own assessment. Sources: https://www.mlit.go.jp/jutakukentiku/house/jutakukentiku_house_tk3_000017.html https://www.gotokyo.org/en/index.html --- # A remote Tokyo property viewing: the evidence to request Canonical: https://property.tokyo/guides/tokyo-remote-property-viewing/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-07 Ask for a continuous walkthrough of the exact unit and its access route, supported by a floor plan and dated written answers. Separate what the camera shows from what still needs a measurement, document or in-person check. Confirm which property you are seeing Before the call, ask the provider to identify the building and exact unit and confirm when the images or video were made. Save the listing reference alongside the appointment. A sample unit, staged photograph or earlier recording can help explain a layout, but it should be identified as such. Prepare a short list of requirements and send it before the viewing. This gives the person holding the camera time to find the relevant dimensions and inventory. It also makes the live call a focused inspection rather than an improvised tour. Follow a continuous route Begin outside and follow the actual route to the unit. Show entry doors, corridors, stairs or lifts without skipping connections. Walk through every room and show storage with doors open when permitted. Identify included furniture and equipment against an inventory. Look at windows and the immediate surroundings from the unit. Finish with questions that need documents or measurements rather than camera footage. Separate observation from confirmation A wide-angle lens can make proportions hard to judge. Ask for measurements for furniture-critical walls and openings. A video call may show a tap or appliance operating, but it does not establish long-term condition, hidden defects or future reliability. Mark those limits in your notes. Internet performance, noise and daylight can vary by time and circumstance. Ask how each requirement can be checked meaningfully. A single video or a provider’s general description should not silently become proof of a condition that matters to your decision. Close the loop in writing Send one concise follow-up listing the property reference, confirmed points and open questions. Ask the provider to correct misunderstandings. Compare the resulting written record with the actual documents before taking a transaction step. If an essential requirement cannot be verified remotely, arrange a suitable local check or keep the property provisional. The official rental guide linked below supports broader process research. This page is a viewing method, not an inspection service or a guarantee about a particular provider. Sources: https://www.mlit.go.jp/jutakukentiku/house/jutakukentiku_house_tk3_000017.html --- # A Tokyo apartment for working from home: a practical brief Canonical: https://property.tokyo/guides/tokyo-apartment-home-office/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-07 Translate “good for remote work” into specific requirements: a usable work surface, suitable connectivity, space for calls and confirmed permission for your intended use. Floor area alone does not answer those questions. Draw a workday into the floor plan Mark where the desk, chair and screen would go, then check the circulation space around them. Include cables, sockets, lighting and storage. A dining table might work for occasional tasks but become a compromise when another household member needs the same space. Think about concurrent activities. A call, cooking and sleep may need separation at particular hours. A layout label does not reveal how sound travels or whether a desk fits behind a closed door. Ask for the dimensions and inspect the arrangement you intend to use. Ask precise connectivity questions What service is available to this exact unit? What setup or installation is required before use? Who arranges the connection and provides support? Which charges are included or billed separately? Where can equipment be placed and connected? How can performance relevant to your work be checked? Keep residential and business uses distinct Quiet desk work, receiving clients, storing business goods and operating a public-facing office are different use cases. Describe what you actually intend to do and ask the relevant provider or professional to confirm suitability. Do not infer permission from the presence of a desk in a listing photograph. JETRO’s business setup material treats office and residence planning as distinct tasks. A company address or office requirement should have its own research path rather than being assumed to be solved by renting a home. Compare comfort alongside the technical details Check reflections on screens, ventilation, temperature control and the view from the working position. Consider where work equipment will go at the end of the day. If you work unusual hours, inspect the home and surroundings at relevant times when possible. Record each requirement as confirmed, provisional or unresolved. This makes an attractive photograph easier to compare with a less striking home that supports your actual routine. The checklist is editorial guidance for asking questions; it does not verify any property’s connectivity, permitted use or working conditions. Sources: https://www.mlit.go.jp/jutakukentiku/house/jutakukentiku_house_tk3_000017.html https://www.jetro.go.jp/en/invest/setting_up/ --- # Comparing Tokyo apartment layouts for a household Canonical: https://property.tokyo/guides/tokyo-family-apartment-layout/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-07 Compare the routines a home must support rather than treating bedroom count as a complete brief. Room separation, circulation, storage and the building entrance can change how usable the same nominal layout feels. List the moments that create pressure Think about a busy morning, overlapping calls, different sleep times and the return home with bags or equipment. Map those activities onto the plan. The aim is to identify where two people need the same space at the same time and whether the layout can handle that. Room count is one input. Door positions, access through other rooms and the usable shape of each room may matter just as much. Ask for dimensions for beds, desks and storage that you intend to bring. Include the path those items need to take through the building. Use a household comparison grid Routine Question for the viewing Arrival Where do bags, shoes and everyday equipment go? Meals Can the kitchen and dining space support the routine? Sleep and calls Which activities need a separate room? Laundry Where are washing, drying and storage arranged? Storage What fits inside the actual cupboards? Leaving home Does the entrance route work with the equipment you use? Test journeys individually Record the destinations each household member uses and compare full routes. One person’s short journey can hide another person’s awkward transfer or long final walk. Use actual destinations and current route information rather than a general label such as family-friendly neighborhood. Local services deserve their own checks. A nearby facility on a map does not establish eligibility, availability, hours or suitability. Consult the relevant organization directly for a requirement that affects your move. Choose explicit compromises After each viewing, write one advantage, one compromise and one unanswered question. Compare those notes against the household’s agreed priorities. This makes the decision less dependent on the most recent viewing or the largest advertised floor area. The layout guide here is an original comparison method. It does not recommend a ward for a particular family or establish the suitability of a home. MLIT’s rental guidance is a useful process resource; the provider’s current documents and the exact building supply the property-specific information. Sources: https://www.mlit.go.jp/jutakukentiku/house/jutakukentiku_house_tk3_000017.html --- # Compare Tokyo property viewings with an evidence log Canonical: https://property.tokyo/guides/tokyo-viewing-comparison/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-07 Use one comparison record for each home. Keep the requirement, provider response, evidence date and unresolved issue together, then compare the homes against the same priorities. Decide the requirements before the viewing Separate essential requirements from preferences and write down what would establish each one. A measured doorway, an inventory and a written permission answer are different kinds of evidence. Decide which you need before a persuasive description changes the standard. Keep the list short enough to use. Three essentials and several preferences are often more workable than an unranked page of wishes. This is an editorial organizing suggestion, not a numerical rule for deciding where to live. Record facts with their source Field Example of what to record Property reference Exact unit and the provider’s listing reference Requirement A desk must fit in a separate room Evidence Measured plan or measurement from a viewing Date and source When and by whom the detail was supplied Status Confirmed, provisional or unanswered Next step The specific follow-up needed before a decision Do not turn unknowns into points A polished comparison score can hide missing information. If the dimensions have not been checked, leave that requirement unresolved rather than awarding an average score. If two prices include different services, ask for a comparable breakdown before comparing them. Write down why a compromise matters. A smaller storage area may be manageable; an access route that does not meet an essential requirement may not be. The record should preserve your reasoning instead of making the decision look more precise than the evidence. Finish with one focused follow-up Send the provider the remaining questions in a single clear message that identifies the exact property. Save the answers beside the viewing record. Ask for corrections if the written documents differ from your notes. Repeat the same process for the shortlist, then review the actual terms with the appropriate professional when needed. The official rental guidance linked below is process background. This log is a research aid, not a valuation, inspection or transaction service. Sources: https://www.mlit.go.jp/jutakukentiku/house/jutakukentiku_house_tk3_000017.html --- # Tokyo property listings: what to check before you enquire Canonical: https://property.tokyo/guides/tokyo-property-listing-evidence/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-07 A useful Tokyo property listing identifies the exact offer, the responsible provider, complete cost information and the date availability was checked. Ask different questions for a rental home, a property purchase and a commercial lease. The templates on property.tokyo help structure those questions; they are not live offers. A good listing saves someone a second conversation Imagine arriving in Tokyo with a move-in date, a budget and a short list of apartments. One advertisement has beautiful photographs but no clear breakdown of charges. Another gives the exact unit, a dated availability check and the questions still awaiting confirmation. The second listing is easier to act on, even if the first has more adjectives. That is the standard we would want a property destination to meet. This article provides an editorial comparison method. It does not claim that property.tokyo currently operates a brokerage, accepts bookings or has an inventory of available homes. Start by identifying the product “Tokyo property” can mean a home to rent, a condominium to buy, a building investment, a shop lease or a management service. Put the actual transaction near the top of the description. Otherwise a reader may mistake a room price for an apartment price, a business sale for a building sale, or a service enquiry for an available property. Ask for the specific unit or asset, the provider’s role and the scope of the offer. An agent, an owner and a service provider have different responsibilities. Confirm relevant authority and credentials with the responsible provider before proceeding. For rentals, compare the full stay Record the intended move-in date, stay length and agreement type. Ask for an itemized explanation of initial payments, recurring charges, optional services and exit conditions. A low headline rent is not a complete cost comparison. For furnished housing, request the exact inventory. Check whether the desk, appliances, bedding and internet arrangement belong to this unit and are included in the quote. For shared housing, separate the private room from shared facilities and responsibilities. MLIT publishes multilingual rental guidance and sample documents that can help readers organize the questions to take to a provider. For purchases, separate the asking price from the evidence A purchase enquiry should identify the asset and proposed rights, then list the documents still required for professional review. Plans, ownership information, building records and recurring charges answer different questions. Treat an asking price as an offer position, not proof of a completed transaction or a future return. For an income property, keep the reporting period and calculation visible. Gross income, net income and a forecast should never be interchangeable labels. The MLIT Real Estate Information Library is a starting point for public property research; its records must be interpreted within their coverage and dates. For business premises, describe the operation An office, a restaurant and a warehouse cannot be assessed with the same checklist. An office may need visitor access and a clear fit-out scope. A restaurant proposal needs questions about utilities, extraction, handover condition and approvals. A warehouse brief needs the movement of vehicles and goods, clear height and documented capacity. Describe the intended activity first and have the responsible professionals assess the premises. A previous tenant’s use or a photograph of equipment does not establish permission or suitability for a new operation. JETRO’s business-setup resources provide wider context for establishing a business in Japan. Use a compact evidence record Field Useful question Identity Does this information refer to the exact unit, asset or service? Costs What is included, separate and still subject to a quote? Space What measurement basis and plan support the description? Access What is the actual route, including steps and restrictions? Authority Who can advertise and answer for this offer? Freshness When was availability or capacity last confirmed? Next step What happens after an enquiry, and who responds? Keep unresolved points visible. “To be confirmed” is more useful than an unsupported assurance, especially when a reader is comparing properties remotely. Turn the checklist into a better advertisement Our listing-template library covers homes, offices, retail, hospitality, land, management and specialist services. Each type has a distinct evidence question and editable description. Brackets are deliberate: real prices, locations, dates and provider details must come from verified information. For a future publishing arrangement, we invite owners and agencies to describe the inventory they are authorized to supply and how they would maintain it. A proposal does not automatically become a listing. We would first need to agree responsibilities, publishing rights and an update process. A clear address needs a useful service behind it property.tokyo is also available for domain acquisition. Its category-and-city identity could support a focused property destination, but the domain sale does not include physical property, a brokerage business or guaranteed search traffic. Whether you are preparing a rental description, planning an agency portal or evaluating the name itself, start with the question your reader needs answered. A specific, supported answer gives that reader a reason to take the next step. Sources: https://www.mlit.go.jp/jutakukentiku/house/jutakukentiku_house_tk3_000017.html https://www.reinfolib.mlit.go.jp/ https://www.jetro.go.jp/en/invest/setting_up/ --- # Nisshinkan in Fukushima: how to read an unusual property listing Canonical: https://property.tokyo/guides/nisshinkan-fukushima-property-listing-case-study/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-07 This is an independent editorial case study of a third-party property advertisement in Fukushima. It is not a Tokyo property or an offer from property.tokyo. Use it to separate the property itself, historical context and the questions a responsible provider would need to answer. A sourced example, with a clear boundary An unusual property can attract attention before anyone has understood the transaction. This case shows how to slow the description down: identify the place, identify the proposed offer, then identify what still needs checking. The resulting record is useful to a reader comparing very different assets. We have not been appointed to market this property, verified its current availability or obtained permission to republish its photography. Enquiries about the property should go through the source advertisement. Domain acquisition enquiries concern property.tokyo only. The source snapshot Field What the source reports Source JamesEdition listing 18657525, consulted 7 October 2026 Name and location Aizu Domain School, Nisshinkan; Aizuwakamatsu, Fukushima, Japan Displayed asking price JPY 500,000,000 Listed provider List Sotheby’s International Realty Japan Use described in the advertisement Tourist facility Verification status Source claims only; current terms and availability not independently confirmed Historical identity and building date are separate facts MLIT’s tourism interpretation material describes a school founded in 1803 and a recreation built in 1987 at a different site. That distinction matters: the age of an institution is not automatically the construction date of the buildings offered today. For any property associated with a historical name, ask for the actual building schedule and supporting records. Separately ask whether any designation, restriction or maintenance obligation applies. An interesting story should not stand in for documentary evidence. A location field should describe the asset The provider’s office location and the asset’s address belong in separate fields. Mixing them can send a person to the wrong region and make a search result misleading. Keep the municipality and prefecture visible in the title, summary and underlying record. For a Tokyo-focused publication, an example from another prefecture can explain a useful method. It should sit within a clearly identified Japan research context, with Tokyo rental and purchase journeys remaining geographically specific. The buyer’s evidence checklist Question Evidence to request from the responsible provider What is actually included? A written schedule separating land, buildings, contents, business assets and excluded items. What supports the measurements? Plans, measurement basis and a building-by-building area schedule. What activity is being assessed? A precise proposed operating brief and professional assessment of applicable requirements. What remains operational? Dated information on occupancy, contracts, maintenance and handover arrangements. What do financial figures represent? Reporting period, accounting basis, source records and separation of actuals from forecasts. What needs a specialist? Property rights, building condition, permitted use, taxation and any operating requirements. An original description pattern Example for adaptation only: “[Asset name] in [municipality], [prefecture], offered as [verified transaction scope]. The provider reports [current use], last checked on [date]. The asking price is [amount and currency]; inclusions and separate costs are [confirmed details]. Supporting records include [documents supplied]. The following questions remain open: [specific points]. Contact [authorized provider] for current terms.” This pattern is deliberately reusable without pretending to advertise an available asset. A publisher should replace the placeholders only after receiving evidence and publishing rights. Keep a dated source record when information changes or the offer is withdrawn. When the example helps a Tokyo search The same method can improve a Tokyo apartment, office, school-premises or hospitality description. Exact location, clear transaction scope, current cost information and a responsible contact are useful across categories. The actual questions will differ with the asset and intended activity. A reader looking for a home to rent needs a current housing offer. A reader comparing unusual Japanese assets may need a case study like this one. Serving those different needs with different page types makes the publication easier to understand. Sources: https://www.jamesedition.com/real_estate/aizuwakamatsu-japan/aizu-domain-school-nisshinkan-18657525 https://www.mlit.go.jp/kankocho/content/001998171.pdf --- # Buying a resale apartment in Tokyo: a practical evidence brief Canonical: https://property.tokyo/guides/buying-resale-apartment-tokyo/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-07 Build four separate records for a Tokyo resale apartment: the unit, the shared building, the exact location and the money required. A renovated interior and a premium address cannot answer all four. This guide provides an original comparison worksheet, not listings or a valuation. Start with a decision brief you can actually compare Write down the intended use, expected holding period, available cash, financing status and essential layout requirements. Keep an unconfirmed loan separate from available funds. Name the regular destinations that matter to you; “central Tokyo” is too broad to describe a daily journey. Create one folder per home, using the provider’s unit identifier and full address. Keep the original Japanese records alongside any translation. Add the document date, who supplied it, what it establishes and what remains unresolved. A brochure, an agent’s explanation and an original building record are different kinds of evidence. The building documents behind the apartment MLIT’s condominium management material highlights the significance of building rules, monthly management and repair-reserve contributions, and planned repairs when buying a unit. Its management portal supplies a detailed checklist. Use those official resources as background; have an appropriate local professional interpret the records for the building you are considering. Request or question What to put in your comparison record Current management rules and use rules Version/date; the clauses relevant to your pets, renovations, parking and intended use; points needing interpretation Long-term repair plan Issue date; planned work; the funding assumptions you need explained Current fees and planned changes Monthly amount; effective date; evidence of any proposed or approved change Management association financial information Period covered; questions about reserve funding and outstanding obligations Recent meeting records Decisions affecting the unit or common facilities; unresolved questions for the reviewer Building condition and work history What was inspected or repaired, by whom and when; matters requiring a technical specialist This table is our request framework, not a complete due-diligence standard. Document access may need the seller’s or manager’s cooperation. “Not supplied” should remain visible in the record. Do not quietly turn a missing document into a positive rating. Keep the purchase budget and ownership budget separate Budget layer Figures to obtain for the specific transaction Purchase and settlement Agreed price, payment schedule, quoted brokerage and professional charges, registration and tax estimates, settlement adjustments Financing, if used Lender quote, fees, repayment schedule, rate assumptions and conditions Recurring ownership Management charge, repair-reserve contribution, optional parking and services, tax/insurance estimates, utilities Works and contingencies Quoted interior work, planned building charges and a separately identified contingency Avoid a universal “extra costs percentage”. The relevant amounts depend on the property, transaction and financing. Ask the professionals handling the purchase for an itemized estimate with a date and scope. A blank field means the budget is incomplete, not that the cost is zero. Here is a deliberately partial, fictional example of why monthly charges matter: Home A has ¥30,000 in management charges, ¥20,000 in reserve contributions and ¥30,000 for the parking you intend to use. Home B has ¥20,000, ¥35,000 and ¥0 respectively. At constant charges for 60 months, those selected payments total ¥4,800,000 for A and ¥3,300,000 for B—a ¥1,500,000 difference. These are invented inputs, not Tokyo prices. They exclude the purchase, financing, taxes, insurance, utilities, works and future charge changes; they are not the total cost of ownership. The point is to expose a recurring difference for further investigation. It does not establish which home is better value. Ask how much of a difference is explained by included services, reserve planning and your actual use. Compare evidence on the same basis For each potential comparison, record whether the figure is an asking price, a reported transaction or an appraisal. Keep its date, area definition, floor area, building age, floor, condition and tenure information where available. Do not divide a price by a different area measurement and present the result as directly comparable. MLIT’s Real Estate Information Library provides a contents-and-sources table, including usage conditions that vary by layer. Check the original dataset’s scope and reuse terms before republishing records. We have not imported transaction comparables into this guide or claimed a current market valuation. Evidence log field Example of how to record it Figure type Asking / reported transaction / appraisal; never leave the type implicit Source and date Original URL or document reference plus the observation date Comparability Known differences in area measure, condition, tenure and building characteristics Missing information List the absent fields; do not fill them with assumed facts Conclusion Question for a qualified reviewer, rather than an unsupported price target Use a shortlist review before proceeding Arrange the records side by side. Separate deal-breakers from preferences: a layout that cannot serve your routine, an unresolved intended-use restriction or an incomplete financing assumption is different from a finish you would prefer to change. Ask a qualified local real estate professional, legal adviser or technical specialist to review the relevant issues before you commit. This page has not been reviewed as transaction advice by a locally licensed professional. It is an editorial preparation tool. No property is offered through it. Sources: https://www.mlit.go.jp/jutakukentiku/house/jutakukentiku_house_tk5_000052.html https://www.reinfolib.mlit.go.jp/help/contents/ --- # Luxury apartments in Tokyo: compare the address and the evidence Canonical: https://property.tokyo/guides/luxury-apartments-tokyo/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-07 For a luxury apartment search in Tokyo, define what the premium buys you: usable space, a particular address, services, privacy or a view. Then verify those features for the exact unit and its contract. This is a research guide, not a catalogue of available homes or a neighborhood ranking. Turn a luxury label into a measurable brief Two homes can carry the same luxury label and solve different needs. One may suit frequent travel and a compact routine; another may suit a household that values storage, a separate working room and quiet evenings. Write the needs down before comparing building names. If the priority is… Ask for evidence about… Usable space Measured room dimensions, circulation, storage and the fit of your furniture Service Actual hours, scope, restrictions, languages and additional charges Privacy and light The unit’s floor and orientation, adjacent buildings and a viewing at a relevant time A view or terrace The exact outlook, access rights, use rules and maintenance responsibilities Parking or deliveries Current allocation, vehicle dimensions, access arrangements and separate fees Record the provider’s answer and its date. A shared building amenity may not be included with every unit, and a photograph alone does not establish the conditions of use. Tokyo areas: orientation first, property decisions second GO TOKYO’s official area guides provide useful local orientation. They do not measure apartment prices or rank buildings. The comparison questions below are our editorial suggestions, not claims that every street in an area has the same character. Area to research Official guide context Property-specific question to resolve Aoyama & Omotesando Shopping, design and cultural destinations Does the exact address give you the walking routes, delivery access and evening environment you want? Roppongi Art, dining, shopping and nightlife How does the unit relate to active streets, and what did you observe during your own evening visit? Azabu Juban A shopping district with traditional and international influences Which station entrance and everyday shops serve the actual building? Ebisu Food, culture and the Yebisu-related destinations What is the complete route between the home, station and your regular destinations? These are selected research starting points, not a comprehensive map of premium Tokyo housing. Area names, station names and ward boundaries serve different purposes. Save the full address; check the relevant municipal information and original transport sources for the route. No travel times, current availability, prices or safety rankings are inferred here. Try an address test: record a morning trip, an evening return and a grocery trip for each shortlisted home. Note the date and the exact route you checked. That produces evidence about your routine, instead of relying on an area’s reputation. Penthouse, tower apartment or low-rise residence? Search term Comparison task Tokyo penthouse Check the plan, roof/terrace access terms, equipment and maintenance responsibilities for the actual unit Tokyo tower apartment Compare lift access, shared-space rules, service scope and the unit’s usable layout Low-rise luxury apartment Check stairs/lifts, privacy, management arrangements and the precise approach from the street Serviced or furnished residence Request the inventory and included service schedule, then confirm the permitted stay and checkout charges These are search categories, not construction assessments. A taller building is not automatically better served; a low-rise building is not automatically quiet. Inspect the features that matter and ask a technical professional about building performance rather than using a marketing label as evidence. Buying and renting need different money comparisons For a purchase, compare the unit’s price with the building responsibilities and the full transaction budget. MLIT’s condominium checklist draws attention to management rules, monthly contributions and repair planning. A recently renovated interior does not replace those records. For a rental, compare cash at signing with the cost of the intended stay. Ask what the rent includes and which services are extra. Our rental calculator separates prepayments, one-off fees and an assumed deposit refund; its sample inputs are fictional and must be replaced with actual quotes. In either case, keep an unresolved-items list alongside the attractive features. For example: “parking requested, allocation unconfirmed” is more useful than a generic parking tick. Do the same for pets, refurbishment, guest use and language support. Make the next enquiry specific A concise brief might read: “I am researching a home for personal use, with a separate work area and space for the furniture measurements attached. Please confirm the exact unit, current status, an itemized cost estimate, the service scope and which building documents can be shared. My timing and financing assumptions are listed separately.” Adapt that example to your situation and send it through the provider’s verified channel. No named building or agent is represented by this publication. This guide has not received a local professional review; use it to prepare better questions for the people responsible for the actual transaction. Sources: https://www.gotokyo.org/en/destinations/western-tokyo/aoyama-and-omotesando/ https://www.gotokyo.org/en/destinations/southern-tokyo/roppongi/index.html https://www.gotokyo.org/en/destinations/southern-tokyo/azabu-juban/index.html https://www.gotokyo.org/en/destinations/southern-tokyo/ebisu/index.html https://www.mansion-info.mlit.go.jp/manshion_kanri/329/ --- # 東京の物件タイプを比較するための基本ガイド Canonical: https://property.tokyo/ja/guides/tokyo-property-types/ Language: ja Published: 2026-10-07 まず利用目的と期間を決め、その後に間取り、建物、設備、サービスを比較します。「東京の不動産」という広い言葉だけでは、個々の物件が目的に合うか判断できません。 物件名より先に、必要な暮らしを整理する 短期の滞在先を探す人と、長く暮らす住まいを探す人では、必要な条件が異なります。入居時期、生活動線、収納、仕事のスペースなど、日常の行動を具体的に書き出してから物件を比較しましょう。「高級」「便利」といった表現は、設備や実際の移動時間などの確認できる情報に置き換えて考えると役立ちます。 住宅と商業用物件を分けて考える 種類 主な確認項目 マンション・集合住宅の住戸 間取り、共用部分、建物のルール 一戸建て 階段、屋外部分、維持管理の分担 家具付き・サービス付き住宅 備品一覧、サービス範囲、契約期間 シェアハウス 専用部分と共用部分、利用ルール オフィス・店舗 事業内容に適した利用条件、搬入、来訪者対応 同じ基準で比較できる記録をつくる 必須条件を三つ、希望条件を三つに絞り、各物件について確認済みの情報と未確認の情報を分けて記録します。写真に写っている家具や設備が実際に含まれるとは限りません。建物全体の説明と、検討中の住戸に適用される条件も区別してください。 国土交通省は外国人の住まい探しを支援する多言語資料を公開しています。一般的な流れを調べる際に参照し、具体的な条件は物件の提供者に確認してください。本サイトはドメイン名の販売と情報提供を目的としており、物件の仲介は行っていません。 Sources: https://www.mlit.go.jp/jutakukentiku/house/jutakukentiku_house_tk3_000017.html https://www.kencorp.com/ --- # 東京の住まい探し：エリア名より生活動線を比較する Canonical: https://property.tokyo/ja/guides/tokyo-neighborhoods-stations/ Language: ja Published: 2026-10-07 エリア名で候補を見つけたら、建物から目的地までの実際の経路を確認しましょう。駅の入口、乗り換え、買い物、建物へのアクセスは、広い地域イメージだけでは判断できません。 区・街・駅は、異なる情報の単位 行政区は公的情報を探すときに役立ち、街の名前は雰囲気を知る手がかりになり、駅は移動を考える基準になります。同じ駅の近くでも、建物の位置や利用する入口によって日々の動線は変わります。候補ごとに所在地と地図を保存し、名称だけで比較しないことが大切です。 候補地を調べるときのチェック項目 平日に繰り返し通う目的地を書き出す。 徒歩区間と乗り換えを含めた経路を確認する。 普段利用する店やサービスへの距離を調べる。 可能であれば異なる時間帯の周辺環境を確認する。 建物の入口、階段、エレベーターなどを確認する。 未確認の内容を、推測で評価点に変えない。 公式エリア情報と物件情報を使い分ける 東京都の公式観光サイトGO TOKYOは、街を知る入口として参考になります。ただし観光情報だけでは、現在の家賃、個別物件の状態、暮らしへの適合性は分かりません。街の紹介は候補を選ぶために使い、具体的な住まいは所在地と建物単位で確認しましょう。 有名な街が必ず自分の生活に合うとは限りません。各候補について「便利な点」「妥協が必要な点」「まだ分からない点」を短く残すと、次に調べる内容が明確になります。本サイトでは住宅の紹介や契約の仲介は行っていません。 Sources: https://www.gotokyo.org/en/index.html https://www.gotokyo.org/en/destinations/central-tokyo/index.html https://www.gotokyo.org/en/destinations/western-tokyo/shibuya/index.html --- # 英語と日本語で使いやすい東京の不動産ポータルを考える Canonical: https://property.tokyo/ja/guides/bilingual-tokyo-property-portal/ Language: ja Published: 2026-10-07 二言語の不動産サイトには、見出しの翻訳だけでなく、物件の事実、検索条件、掲載状況、問い合わせ対応の一貫性が必要です。最初に対象読者と解決する課題を絞りましょう。 最初に、誰のどの課題を解決するか決める 来日直後の借主、管理会社を探す所有者、オフィスを探す企業では、必要な情報が異なります。最初の公開では一つの導線に集中し、比較しやすい情報や適切な問い合わせにつながる構成を考えます。広い分野を表すドメインであっても、運営開始時から全サービスを提供する必要はありません。 事実と翻訳を分けて管理する 物件や記事に共通の識別子を持たせる。 住所、面積、日付、掲載状況を両言語で揃える。 同じ内容の英語版と日本語版を直接リンクする。 問い合わせ項目と対応言語を明確にする。 翻訳で重要な条件を省略しない。 訂正を一方の言語だけに反映しない。 情報の責任範囲を表示する 出典と確認日を表示し、掲載終了の物件はその状態を明示します。誰が取引を担当するのか、広告と編集記事はどこで区別されるのかも読者が分かるようにします。検索機能が動作しなくても、主要な説明を通常のHTMLで読める構成が望まれます。 property.tokyoは、不動産という分野と東京という地域を組み合わせたドメイン名です。ポータルや情報メディアへの活用は将来の構想であり、現在の運営サービスではありません。成果は運営体制、正確な情報、継続的な更新などに左右されます。 Sources: https://www.mlit.go.jp/jutakukentiku/house/jutakukentiku_house_tk3_000017.html https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/ai-features --- # 東京の不動産検索とAI：確認できる情報を中心に設計する Canonical: https://property.tokyo/ja/guides/ai-tokyo-real-estate-search/ Language: ja Published: 2026-10-07 AIは条件の整理や確認済み情報の比較を支援できますが、空室状況や費用を推測で作るべきではありません。正確なデータと、読者が元の情報を確認できるリンクが基盤になります。 自然な文章と正確な答えは同じではない 家具付きの部屋を探す場合でも、必要なのは現在の掲載状況、備品、利用期間、目的地への経路などの情報です。これらが確認できなければ、AIは探し方を説明することはできても、確実な候補があるかのように回答すべきではありません。分からないことを明示できる仕組みが必要です。 回答の前に、事実の記録をつくる 記録する情報 役割 元のURLと識別子 読者が出典を確認できる 掲載状況と確認日 古い情報を見分けられる 単位と定義 異なる条件の数字を混同しない 情報提供者 個別の条件を誰に確認するか分かる 未確認・条件付きの項目 推測を確定事項に変えない 利用条件 再利用できる範囲を確認する 読みやすいページを基盤にする 重要な説明をHTMLで公開し、分かりやすい見出しと関連ページへのリンクを用意します。構造化データも実際に表示される内容と一致させます。GoogleはAI検索機能のためだけの特別な構造化データを必要としていません。OpenAIも検索用クローラーと学習用クローラーの制御を区別して説明しています。 クローラーのアクセスを許可しても、掲載や引用は保証されません。本サイトに現在の物件データベースやAI物件推薦機能はありません。公開資料はドメインの事実と編集記事を読みやすく整理するためのもので、AIに特定の推薦を強制するものではありません。 Sources: https://developers.google.com/search/docs/appearance/ai-features https://developers.openai.com/api/docs/bots https://www.reinfolib.mlit.go.jp/help/contents/ --- # Tokyo condo management & repair-reserve cost planner Canonical: https://property.tokyo/tools/tokyo-condo-cost-planner/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-07 Tokyo condo management and repair-reserve cost planner. Independent editorial planning tool, published 7 October 2026. Not locally reviewed transaction advice. Compare selected building charges for two apartments over 1 to 360 whole months. Management fees and other entered monthly charges remain constant. Repair-reserve contributions change once, starting with and including the specified month. A one-off contribution is counted once only if its payment month falls within the comparison period. Year rows are periods of 12 months from the start of the scenario, with a shorter final row where needed. Amounts are nominal JPY, with no discounting or automatic inflation. Fictional example: over 120 months, A has management fees of 30000 per month and repair contributions of 20000 for months 1–60 then 35000 for months 61–120. B has management fees of 25000 and repair contributions of 30000 throughout. Both have zero other charges and zero one-off payments. A totals 6900000 JPY and B 6600000 JPY. A starts 5000 JPY per month lower, yet its included charges total 300000 JPY more over this period. These are invented values, not market averages or quotes. Excludes purchase price, transaction charges, loan payments, taxes, insurance, utilities, interior works, unentered charges and any sale proceeds. No inflation, discounting or investment return is assumed. Document status is self-reported and never a score of building quality or funding adequacy. Request a dated fee schedule, repair plan and supporting meeting decisions; record missing evidence and obtain qualified interpretation before a transaction. Calculations and CSV export run in the browser without sending inputs to this site. The CSV includes assumptions, exclusions, evidence status and yearly component totals. Static examples and methodology are readable without JavaScript. Sources: https://www.mlit.go.jp/jutakukentiku/house/content/001978284.pdf --- # Tokyo property: areas, rental costs & planning | property.tokyo Canonical: https://property.tokyo/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-09 YOUR NEXT CHAPTER, IN TOKYO Find your place. Understand the whole picture. From the right neighborhood to the real move-in cost. Make your Tokyo property search a little more certain. Rent Buy Monthly stays Workspaces Invest WHERE WOULD YOU LIKE TO LIVE? Explore → Explore area information and planning tools. Live property listings are not yet available. A city of different everyday lives 23 wards · Tama · Tokyo islands 東京都 ↗ 62 Tokyo municipalities to explore 47 Prefectures in the Japan directory EN / 日本語 Explore in your language ¥ Compare your full cost assumptions START WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD One Tokyo. Many ways to live. Browse local context, then check the exact address, station entrance and building. ♡ ward · TOKYO Shibuya 渋谷区 Ward extending beyond central Shibuya to Harajuku, Yoyogi, Ebisu, Daikanyama, Sasazuka and other neighbourhoods. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Minato 港区 Ward spanning Shiba, Azabu, Akasaka, Takanawa and Shibaura-Konan, with inland districts and a Tokyo Bay waterfront. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Setagaya 世田谷区 Ward organised into five areas: Setagaya, Kitazawa, Tamagawa, Kinuta and Karasuyama. These areas contain many separate neighbourhoods. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Shinjuku 新宿区 Ward encompassing the Shinjuku station area, Yotsuya, Kagurazaka, Takadanobaba-Waseda-Okubo and Ochiai. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Musashino 武蔵野市 City with three local areas: Kichijoji, the central area north of Mitaka station, and Musashisakai. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Koto 江東区 Ward with Fukagawa and Kiyosumi-Shirakawa, Joto and Sunamachi, and the Toyosu and waterfront districts. Explore the area ↗ Explore all of Tokyo ↗ MAKE THE NUMBERS MAKE SENSE A clearer decision, before you commit. ¥ The price beyond the rent ↗ Key money, deposits, guarantor fees and renewals. Compare the cash needed now and the cost of your stay. ↔ A shortlist with a purpose ↗ Save areas, record your commute needs and build a brief you can share with an agent you choose. ◎ Know what is still unknown ↗ Keep source, date and verification status beside the facts. Unknown is more useful than an invented answer. ⌂ Beyond central Tokyo ↗ Explore all 23 wards, the Tama cities and Tokyo islands. Each is a different geographic and practical context. Build a better property experience with us. For agents, owners, developers and relocation teams. Prepare accurate listings and discuss a Tokyo-focused partnership. Partner with us ↗ Sources: --- # Tokyo area finder: all 62 municipalities | property.tokyo Canonical: https://property.tokyo/tokyo/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-09 property.tokyo / Tokyo areas TOKYO, WITH CONTEXT Find the Tokyo that fits your life. All 62 municipalities, clearly separated into wards, cities, towns and villages. Search includes selected station names; it is not a complete rail network. Area or selected station Municipality type All Tokyo 23 wards 26 cities 5 towns 8 villages Your purpose Rent Buy Monthly stay Commercial Investment research 62 municipalities ♡ ward · TOKYO Chiyoda 千代田区 Central Tokyo ward containing the Marunouchi and Otemachi business districts beside the Imperial Palace grounds. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Chuo 中央区 Central ward with distinct Nihonbashi, Kyobashi and Tsukishima areas; use the local district as well as the ward when comparing addresses. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Minato 港区 Ward spanning Shiba, Azabu, Akasaka, Takanawa and Shibaura-Konan, with inland districts and a Tokyo Bay waterfront. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Shinjuku 新宿区 Ward encompassing the Shinjuku station area, Yotsuya, Kagurazaka, Takadanobaba-Waseda-Okubo and Ochiai. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Bunkyo 文京区 A ward shaped by educational institutions and historic gardens, including Koishikawa Korakuen and Rikugien. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Taito 台東区 Ward containing Ueno, Asakusa and Yanaka, from the Ueno upland to the Sumida River on its eastern side. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Sumida 墨田区 River-linked ward with the Sumida River, Arakawa, Old Nakagawa and a network of smaller waterways. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Koto 江東区 Ward with Fukagawa and Kiyosumi-Shirakawa, Joto and Sunamachi, and the Toyosu and waterfront districts. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Shinagawa 品川区 Ward divided into Shinagawa, Osaki, Oi, Ebara and Yashio areas, with uplands, river lowlands and waterfront land. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Meguro 目黒区 Ward with distinct local planning areas around Nakameguro, Jiyugaoka, Ikejiri-Ohashi and the Meguro station area. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Ota 大田区 Southern Tokyo ward with Kamata as a local civic centre and Rokugo neighbourhoods beside the Tama River. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Setagaya 世田谷区 Ward organised into five areas: Setagaya, Kitazawa, Tamagawa, Kinuta and Karasuyama. These areas contain many separate neighbourhoods. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Shibuya 渋谷区 Ward extending beyond central Shibuya to Harajuku, Yoyogi, Ebisu, Daikanyama, Sasazuka and other neighbourhoods. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Nakano 中野区 Ward with neighbourhoods such as Nogata, Arai and Saginomiya, alongside the separately planned Nakano station area. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Suginami 杉並区 Ward with locally distinct areas including Koenji, Asagaya and Ogikubo; neighbourhood-level information is useful alongside ward services. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Toshima 豊島区 Ward containing Ikebukuro, Sugamo, Otsuka, Komagome and Mejiro. It is separate from Toshima Village in the Izu Islands. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Kita 北区 Ward organised around the Akabane, Oji and Takinogawa areas, with multiple neighbourhood centres. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Arakawa 荒川区 Ward containing Minami-Senju, Machiya, Nippori and Ogu areas; district names help distinguish local services and addresses. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Itabashi 板橋区 Ward with Itabashi, Tokiwadai, Shimura, Akatsuka and Takashimadaira areas, each with different local histories and townscapes. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Nerima 練馬区 Ward with local centres around Nerima, Shakujii-Koen and Oizumi-Gakuen, and the Hikarigaoka district. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Adachi 足立区 Northern ward crossed by the Arakawa, with generally flat terrain and rivers along several boundaries. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Katsushika 葛飾区 Ward with Mizumoto, Shibamata, Kanamachi, Kameari and Aoto areas; northern districts connect parks and waterways. Explore the area ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO Edogawa 江戸川区 Ward divided into Koiwa, Shishibone, Tobu, Chuo, Kasai and Komatsugawa areas; Koiwa lies beside the Edogawa River. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Hachioji 八王子市 Tama city whose landscape includes Mount Takao, Mount Jinba and parts of the Tama and Kasumi hills. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Tachikawa 立川市 Central Tama city with a major commercial area around Tachikawa station, the Tama River to the south and Tamagawa Josui to the north. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Musashino 武蔵野市 City with three local areas: Kichijoji, the central area north of Mitaka station, and Musashisakai. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Mitaka 三鷹市 City on the southern part of the Musashino Plateau, adjoining Musashino to the north and Chofu to the south. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Ome 青梅市 Northwestern Tokyo city along the Tama River, at the transition from urban land to the mountains of Chichibu-Tama-Kai National Park. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Fuchu 府中市 City in central Tokyo with the Tama River at its southern edge and terrace land extending northward. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Akishima 昭島市 City between Tachikawa and Fussa, with Hachioji and Hino along its southern side and the historic Haijima area in the west. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Chofu 調布市 City with Jindaiji woodland in the north, the Tama River in the south and the Kokubunji escarpment between terrace levels. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Machida 町田市 City at Tokyo's southern edge, projecting into Kanagawa Prefecture and occupying western and central parts of the Tama Hills. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Koganei 小金井市 City on the southwestern Musashino Plateau, between Musashino and Mitaka to the east and Kokubunji to the west. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Kodaira 小平市 City on the Musashino Plateau with Tamagawa Josui, Nobidome Yosui and linked green corridors. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Hino 日野市 Tama city where the Asakawa meets the Tama River, with river landscapes forming part of the local geography. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Higashimurayama 東村山市 City adjoining Tokorozawa across the Sayama Hills and Yanase River area, with Kiyose and Higashikurume to the east. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Kokubunji 国分寺市 City on the Musashino terrace where the Kokubunji escarpment, springs and Nogawa shape the southern landscape. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Kunitachi 国立市 City between Tachikawa and Fuchu, with Daigaku-dori extending south from Kunitachi station and the Tama River at the southern edge. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Fussa 福生市 City at the western edge of the Musashino Plateau, with river terraces descending from the Yokota area toward the Tama River. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Komae 狛江市 City beside the Tama River, between Setagaya and Chofu, with Kawasaki across the river to the south. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Higashiyamato 東大和市 Northern Tama city adjoining Tokorozawa and containing Lake Tama, with Tachikawa and Kodaira to the south. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Kiyose 清瀬市 City with the Yanase River along its northeastern boundary with Tokorozawa, linking local life to river landscapes. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Higashikurume 東久留米市 City on the Musashino Plateau with the Kurome and Ochiai rivers and the Minamisawa spring area. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Musashimurayama 武蔵村山市 City south of the Sayama Hills, adjoining Mizuho, Tachikawa and Higashiyamato. Its northern landscape includes wooded hills. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Tama 多摩市 City on the northern edge of the Tama Hills, with river lowlands and extensive developed residential land. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Inagi 稲城市 Eastern South Tama city between the Tama River and Tama Hills, with the Misawa River crossing the city. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Hamura 羽村市 City beside the Tama River with the historic intake of Tamagawa Josui and a mix of residential and industrial areas. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Akiruno あきる野市 Western Tokyo city linked to the Akigawa Valley, which continues from Akiruno into neighbouring Hinohara Village. Explore the area ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO Nishitokyo 西東京市 City containing Tanashi, Hoya and Hibarigaoka areas, served by the Seibu Shinjuku and Ikebukuro rail corridors. Explore the area ↗ ♡ town · TOKYO Mizuho 瑞穂町 Town in northwestern Tokyo on the western Musashino Plateau, with access to the Sayama Hills landscape. Explore the area ↗ ♡ town · TOKYO Hinode 日の出町 Nishitama town with the Hirai and Oguno areas; these local names also structure municipal facilities and school information. Explore the area ↗ ♡ town · TOKYO Okutama 奥多摩町 Mountain town at Tokyo's northwestern end, with the Tama River running through it and Lake Okutama in the wider mountain landscape. Explore the area ↗ ♡ village · TOKYO Hinohara 檜原村 Tokyo's only mainland village, with settlements along the north and south Akigawa valleys amid mountain forests. Explore the area ↗ ♡ town · TOKYO Oshima 大島町 Island municipality on Izu Oshima, where Mount Mihara forms the central volcanic landscape. Explore the area ↗ ♡ town · TOKYO Hachijo 八丈町 Island town centred on Hachijojima, formed by the Hachijo-Fuji and Mihara volcanic massifs; Hachijokojima is a separate island in the town. Explore the area ↗ ♡ village · TOKYO Toshima Village 利島村 Small volcanic island municipality around Mount Miyatsuka, with little flat land. Distinct from mainland Toshima Ward. Explore the area ↗ ♡ village · TOKYO Niijima 新島村 Island village whose inhabited islands are Niijima and Shikinejima, with Honson and Wakago on Niijima. Explore the area ↗ ♡ village · TOKYO Kozushima 神津島村 Izu island village with Mount Tenjo, coves and sandy beaches; island geography should be distinguished from mainland Tokyo searches. Explore the area ↗ ♡ village · TOKYO Miyake 三宅村 Island municipality on Miyakejima, a volcanic island with Mount Oyama at its centre. Explore the area ↗ ♡ village · TOKYO Mikurashima 御蔵島村 Island village south of Miyakejima, with extensive native forest and abundant water resources. Explore the area ↗ ♡ village · TOKYO Aogashima 青ヶ島村 Remote island village with a distinctive volcanic caldera and an inner volcanic cone. Explore the area ↗ ♡ village · TOKYO Ogasawara 小笠原村 Pacific island municipality whose resident communities are on Chichijima and Hahajima, separate from the Izu island group. Explore the area ↗ No matching area yet Try the municipality name in Japanese or English. Selected station names are included, but not every neighborhood or station. Sources: https://www.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/ --- # Tokyo rental & mortgage cost planner | property.tokyo Canonical: https://property.tokyo/tools/tokyo-costs/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-09 property.tokyo / Cost planner TOKYO, WITH CONTEXT The cost of getting in. And staying. Use your own written quotes. The starting figures below are fictional examples, not Tokyo market averages or offers. Renting Buying · loan model Your rental quote Monthly rent Monthly management fee Stay length (whole months) Deposit (months of rent) Key money (months of rent) Agency fee, tax included (JPY) Initial guarantor charge (JPY) Initial insurance (JPY) Other initial fees (JPY) Expected deposit returned (JPY) Annual extra fees (JPY) Contract renewal charge (JPY) Renewal interval (months) Calculate rental costs The full picture from these inputs Move-in cash includes one prepaid month of rent and management fees. The prepaid month is counted only once in the total. Annual and renewal fees apply only when you stay beyond their anniversary. Deposit refund is an assumption, not a guarantee. Excludes utilities, moving expenses, unentered exit charges, prorated rent and charges outside these inputs. For a detailed A/B comparison including utilities and exit costs, use the existing rental comparison below. Detailed A/B rental comparison ↗ Export inputs & results MLIT: renting a home in Japan ↗ A constant-rate loan scenario Purchase price (JPY) Down payment (JPY) Annual interest rate (%) Loan term (years) Monthly non-loan costs (JPY) Other upfront costs (JPY) Calculate scenario Estimated commitment Assumes a fully amortizing loan with constant interest and monthly payments. No lender offer, approval prediction, investment return or tax calculation. Enter maintenance, repair reserve, insurance and annual taxes converted to monthly amounts yourself. Variable rates and special levies require separate scenarios. Compare building charges over time ↗ Sources: https://www.mlit.go.jp/jutakukentiku/house/jutakukentiku_house_tk3_000025.html --- # Tokyo agents, owners & developers | property.tokyo Canonical: https://property.tokyo/professionals/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-09 property.tokyo / For professionals TOKYO, WITH CONTEXT Better information. Better qualified enquiries. A Tokyo-focused partnership programme in development. Prepare your data today; discuss publication and commercial terms before any listing goes live. 01 Agents & owners Prepare current availability, full fees, contract conditions and permission to publish. 02 Developers Prepare project facts, official documents, delivery dates and translated evidence. 03 Relocation & services Discuss corporate housing and moving, guarantor or management service partnerships. Check a listing data file Choose a JSON array (maximum 1 MB / 1,000 records). Validation runs in your browser. Files are not uploaded or published. No identity or licence verification is implied by passing these format checks. Listing JSON file Download empty template Export validated records Publication starts with evidence Provider company, brokerage licence where applicable, and a verified contact. Owner authorization or a syndication licence, with a reference. JPY price, payment period, floor area and exact municipality. Availability expiry and verification within the last 14 days. Foreign-resident and pet conditions must be yes, no or unknown. Open a partnership email ↗ No subscription or paid placement is active yet. Commercial terms, legal review, billing and provider verification must be completed before paid services launch. Sources: https://www.reinfolib.mlit.go.jp/ --- # Tokyo property data sources & methodology | property.tokyo Canonical: https://property.tokyo/data-methodology/ Language: en Published: 2026-10-09 property.tokyo / Sources & methodology TOKYO, WITH CONTEXT Know what the information can tell you. Our goal is a useful, verifiable Tokyo property decision. Every connected service and every unconnected dependency should be clear. Geographic coverage Tokyo Metropolis comprises 23 special wards, 26 cities, five towns and eight villages. This is different from the Greater Tokyo region. We do not treat all municipality names as neighborhoods or assume the same service availability everywhere. The directory covers all 62 municipality names and official links. Individual area briefs are available for research but remain excluded from search indexing until more original local evidence is added. Selected station names are references, not a complete route or travel-time dataset. Property listings and rights There is no live listing feed connected. Publicly visible listings, photographs, floor plans and brochures are not automatically licensed for republication. We require documented permission, a source, verification date and availability expiry before an offer can be published. Passing our file validator only checks data format and declarations. Public data and risk MLIT’s Real Estate Information Library provides price, land-use and related public information; its API needs approved access and is not a feed of available properties. Hazard information describes specific datasets and dates, not a guarantee of safety. Follow official maps and consult the exact address with a qualified provider. Costs, estimates and eligibility Calculator values are fictional starting assumptions and can be replaced. They are not mortgage offers, tax advice or a market-price survey. Eligibility, foreign-resident acceptance, guarantor terms and accessibility depend on the provider and property. Unknown conditions remain unknown. Privacy and saved information Saved areas and explicitly saved briefs stay in local storage on your device. Downloads remain yours. Opening a mail draft does not send it. Listing-file validation stays in the browser. These new tools do not transmit your inputs to a CRM or analytics service. Clear the saved brief or use browser settings to remove local storage. Corrections and review Prepared with AI assistance and source-linked editorial review. No independent Japanese real-estate professional review is claimed. Send corrections with the page URL and a primary source to joio.design@gmail.com . Tokyo Metropolitan Government ↗ GSI hazard map portal ↗ MLIT Real Estate Information Library ↗ MLIT rental guidance ↗ UR Tokyo ↗ JKK Tokyo ↗ Page reviewed: 2026-10-09 Sources: https://www.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/ https://disaportal.gsi.go.jp/ https://www.reinfolib.mlit.go.jp/ https://www.mlit.go.jp/jutakukentiku/house/jutakukentiku_house_tk3_000025.html https://www.ur-net.go.jp/chintai/kanto/tokyo/ https://www.to-kousya.or.jp/ --- # 東京の不動産・エリア・賃貸費用を比較 | property.tokyo Canonical: https://property.tokyo/ja/ Language: ja Published: 2026-10-09 東京で始める、次の暮らし この街で、 自分らしい 住まい選びを。 街の特徴から入居時の費用まで。東京の住まい探しに、確かな判断材料を。 借りる 買う マンスリー 事業用 投資を検討 どのエリアを調べますか？ 検索 → エリア情報と検討ツールを検索できます。募集中の物件情報は現在提供していません。 街ごとに違う、日々の暮らし 23 wards · Tama · Tokyo islands 東京都 ↗ 62 東京都の区市町村 47 全国の都道府県ガイド EN / 日本語 日本語・英語で調べる ¥ 費用の内訳を自分で比較 START WITH THE NEIGHBORHOOD ひとつの東京、多様な暮らし。 エリアの特徴を知ったら、住所・駅の出入口・建物を具体的に確認しましょう。 ♡ ward · TOKYO 渋谷区 Shibuya 渋谷駅周辺に加え、原宿・代々木・恵比寿・代官山・笹塚などの街を含む特別区です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 港区 Minato 芝・麻布・赤坂・高輪・芝浦港南の各地区を含み、内陸の街から東京湾の水辺まで広がる特別区です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 世田谷区 Setagaya 世田谷・北沢・玉川・砧・烏山の5地域からなる特別区です。各地域の中に複数の町丁目があります。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 新宿区 Shinjuku 新宿駅周辺、四谷、神楽坂、高田馬場・早稲田・大久保、落合など、特色の異なる地域を含む特別区です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 武蔵野市 Musashino 吉祥寺、三鷹駅北側の中央圏、武蔵境の3つの駅圏を持つ市です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 江東区 Koto 深川・清澄白河、城東・砂町、豊洲・臨海部などの地域を含む特別区です。 エリアを調べる ↗ 東京都全域を見る ↗ MAKE THE NUMBERS MAKE SENSE 契約の前に、判断材料を整理。 ¥ 家賃以外の費用も ↗ 礼金・敷金・保証料・更新料。今必要な現金と、住む期間全体の費用を比較します。 ↔ 希望条件を整理する ↗ 候補エリアと通勤条件をまとめ、選んだ不動産会社に共有できる資料を作れます。 ◎ 未確認の点を見える化 ↗ 出典・確認日・確認状況を情報と一緒に整理。わからない項目は未確認として残します。 ⌂ 都心の外にも選択肢を ↗ 23区、多摩地域、島しょ地域。それぞれの交通や生活条件を区別して調べられます。 より良い不動産体験を、一緒に。 仲介会社・オーナー・デベロッパー・転居支援事業者の皆さまへ。正確な掲載情報を準備し、東京に特化した連携をご相談ください。 事業者向け案内 ↗ Sources: --- # 東京エリア検索：全62区市町村 | property.tokyo Canonical: https://property.tokyo/ja/tokyo/ Language: ja Published: 2026-10-09 property.tokyo / 東京のエリア TOKYO, WITH CONTEXT 暮らしに合う東京を探す。 23区・26市・5町・8村を区別して検索できます。一部の駅名にも対応していますが、全駅を網羅した鉄道検索ではありません。 エリア・一部の駅名 区市町村の種類 すべて 23区 26市 5町 8村 検討の目的 賃貸 購入 マンスリー 事業用 投資の調査 62 区市町村 ♡ ward · TOKYO 千代田区 Chiyoda 皇居周辺に大手町・丸の内の業務地区が広がる都心の特別区です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 中央区 Chuo 日本橋・京橋・月島の地域からなる特別区です。住まいを比べる際は、区名に加えて地域名も確認できます。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 港区 Minato 芝・麻布・赤坂・高輪・芝浦港南の各地区を含み、内陸の街から東京湾の水辺まで広がる特別区です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 新宿区 Shinjuku 新宿駅周辺、四谷、神楽坂、高田馬場・早稲田・大久保、落合など、特色の異なる地域を含む特別区です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 文京区 Bunkyo 教育機関が集まり、小石川後楽園や六義園など歴史ある庭園も残る特別区です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 台東区 Taito 上野・浅草・谷中を含み、西側の上野の高台から東側の隅田川へ広がる特別区です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 墨田区 Sumida 隅田川・荒川・旧中川のほか、北十間川や大横川など複数の河川がある特別区です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 江東区 Koto 深川・清澄白河、城東・砂町、豊洲・臨海部などの地域を含む特別区です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 品川区 Shinagawa 品川・大崎・大井・荏原・八潮の地区に分かれ、台地、河川沿いの低地、臨海部を含む特別区です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 目黒区 Meguro 中目黒・自由が丘・池尻大橋・目黒駅周辺など、地区ごとのまちづくりが進められている特別区です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 大田区 Ota 蒲田に区役所などが集まり、六郷地区が多摩川に面する東京南部の特別区です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 世田谷区 Setagaya 世田谷・北沢・玉川・砧・烏山の5地域からなる特別区です。各地域の中に複数の町丁目があります。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 渋谷区 Shibuya 渋谷駅周辺に加え、原宿・代々木・恵比寿・代官山・笹塚などの街を含む特別区です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 中野区 Nakano 野方・新井・鷺宮などの地区を含む特別区です。中野駅周辺では専用のまちづくり情報が公開されています。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 杉並区 Suginami 高円寺・阿佐谷・荻窪などの地域を含む特別区です。区全体の制度と合わせて、地域別の生活情報を確認できます。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 豊島区 Toshima 池袋・巣鴨・大塚・駒込・目白などを含む特別区です。伊豆諸島の利島村とは異なる自治体です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 北区 Kita 赤羽・王子・滝野川の3地域を軸に、複数の生活拠点がある特別区です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 荒川区 Arakawa 南千住・町屋・日暮里・尾久などの地域を含む特別区です。地区名を確認すると、住所や生活サービスを区別しやすくなります。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 板橋区 Itabashi 板橋・常盤台・志村・赤塚・高島平など、歴史や街並みの異なる地域を持つ特別区です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 練馬区 Nerima 練馬・石神井公園・大泉学園の駅周辺や光が丘地区などに地域の拠点がある特別区です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 足立区 Adachi 東京23区の北部にあり、荒川が区内を横断する特別区です。地形はおおむね平坦で、区境にも複数の河川があります。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 葛飾区 Katsushika 水元・柴又・金町・亀有・青戸などの地域を含む特別区です。北部には公園や水辺が広がります。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ ward · TOKYO 江戸川区 Edogawa 小岩・鹿骨・東部・中央・葛西・小松川の各地区からなる特別区です。小岩地区は江戸川に面しています。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 八王子市 Hachioji 高尾山・陣馬山や多摩丘陵・加住丘陵など、山地と丘陵の景観を持つ多摩地域の市です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 立川市 Tachikawa 立川駅周辺に商業地が広がる多摩地域の市です。市域の南に多摩川、北に玉川上水が流れます。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 武蔵野市 Musashino 吉祥寺、三鷹駅北側の中央圏、武蔵境の3つの駅圏を持つ市です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 三鷹市 Mitaka 武蔵野台地の中央部南端に位置し、北で武蔵野市、南で調布市に接する市です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 青梅市 Ome 東京都北西部の多摩川沿いにあり、市街地から秩父多摩甲斐国立公園の山間部へつながる市です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 府中市 Fuchu 東京都の中央部にあり、南端を多摩川が流れ、その北側に平坦地と段丘が広がる市です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 昭島市 Akishima 立川市と福生市の間に位置し、南側で八王子市・日野市に接する市です。西部には拝島地区があります。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 調布市 Chofu 北に深大寺の森、南に多摩川があり、段丘の境に国分寺崖線が通る市です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 町田市 Machida 東京都の南端から神奈川県側へ突き出す形を持ち、多摩丘陵の西部から中央部に位置する市です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 小金井市 Koganei 武蔵野台地の南西部にあり、東で武蔵野市・三鷹市、西で国分寺市に接する市です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 小平市 Kodaira 武蔵野台地に位置し、玉川上水・野火止用水などの水路と緑のつながりを持つ市です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 日野市 Hino 浅川が多摩川に合流する多摩地域の市で、川沿いの景観が地域の地形を特徴づけています。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 東村山市 Higashimurayama 北側で狭山丘陵・柳瀬川を介して所沢市に接し、東側に清瀬市・東久留米市がある市です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 国分寺市 Kokubunji 武蔵野段丘に位置し、南側の国分寺崖線、湧水、野川が地形を特徴づける市です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 国立市 Kunitachi 立川市と府中市の間にあり、国立駅から南へ大学通りが伸び、南側で多摩川に接する市です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 福生市 Fussa 武蔵野台地の西端にあり、横田基地のある東側から多摩川へ向かって河岸段丘が続く市です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 狛江市 Komae 世田谷区と調布市に接し、南側では多摩川を挟んで川崎市に向かい合う市です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 東大和市 Higashiyamato 多摩湖があり、北で所沢市、南で立川市・小平市に接する多摩地域の市です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 清瀬市 Kiyose 北東部の所沢市との市境を柳瀬川が流れ、川沿いの景観がある市です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 東久留米市 Higashikurume 武蔵野台地に位置し、黒目川・落合川と南沢湧水群などの水辺を持つ市です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 武蔵村山市 Musashimurayama 狭山丘陵の南側にあり、瑞穂町・立川市・東大和市に接する市です。北部には丘陵の緑が広がります。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 多摩市 Tama 多摩丘陵の北端部に位置し、河川沿いの低地と大規模な宅地造成地を含む市です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 稲城市 Inagi 南多摩地域の東端にあり、多摩川と多摩丘陵の間に広がる市です。市内を三沢川が流れます。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 羽村市 Hamura 多摩川沿いに玉川上水の取入口があり、住宅地と工業地域を持つ市です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO あきる野市 Akiruno あきる野市から隣接する檜原村へ続く秋川渓谷を持つ、東京都西部の市です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ city · TOKYO 西東京市 Nishitokyo 田無・保谷・ひばりが丘などの地域を含み、西武新宿線と西武池袋線が通る市です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ town · TOKYO 瑞穂町 Mizuho 東京都北西部、武蔵野台地の西部に位置し、狭山丘陵の自然に接する町です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ town · TOKYO 日の出町 Hinode 平井と大久野の地域を持つ西多摩郡の町です。町の施設や学校の情報も、これらの地名で確認できます。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ town · TOKYO 奥多摩町 Okutama 東京都の北西端にある山間の町です。多摩川が町内を流れ、山々の間に奥多摩湖があります。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ village · TOKYO 檜原村 Hinohara 東京都の本土部で唯一の村です。山林に囲まれ、北秋川・南秋川沿いに集落が点在しています。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ town · TOKYO 大島町 Oshima 伊豆大島を行政区域とする町で、島の中央には火山地形をつくる三原山があります。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ town · TOKYO 八丈町 Hachijo 八丈富士と三原山からなる八丈島を中心とする町です。町域には別の島である八丈小島も含まれます。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ village · TOKYO 利島村 Toshima Village 宮塚山を中心とする火山島の村で、平地が少ない地形です。本土の豊島区とは異なります。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ village · TOKYO 新島村 Niijima 有人島の新島・式根島を含む村です。新島には本村と若郷の地区があります。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ village · TOKYO 神津島村 Kozushima 天上山や入り江、砂浜を持つ伊豆諸島の村です。住まい探しでは本土の東京都内とは分けて確認できます。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ village · TOKYO 三宅村 Miyake 島の中央に雄山がある火山島、三宅島の村です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ village · TOKYO 御蔵島村 Mikurashima 三宅島の南に位置し、原生林と豊富な水資源を持つ御蔵島の村です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ village · TOKYO 青ヶ島村 Aogashima 火口カルデラと内輪山を持つ、特徴的な火山地形の離島の村です。 エリアを調べる ↗ ♡ village · TOKYO 小笠原村 Ogasawara 父島・母島に住民の暮らしがある太平洋上の村です。伊豆諸島とは別の小笠原諸島に属します。 エリアを調べる ↗ 一致するエリアがありません 日本語または英語の区市町村名で検索してください。駅名・町名はすべてを収録しているわけではありません。 Sources: https://www.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/ --- # 東京の賃貸・住宅ローン費用計算 | property.tokyo Canonical: https://property.tokyo/ja/tools/tokyo-costs/ Language: ja Published: 2026-10-09 property.tokyo / 費用の比較 TOKYO, WITH CONTEXT 入居する費用。暮らし続ける費用。 書面の見積もりに置き換えてください。初期値は架空の例であり、東京の相場や実際の募集条件ではありません。 賃貸 購入・ローン 賃貸の見積もり 月額家賃 月額管理費 居住期間（月数） 敷金（家賃の月数） 礼金（家賃の月数） 仲介手数料・税込（円） 保証会社初回費用（円） 初回保険料（円） その他初期費用（円） 敷金返還見込（円） 毎年の追加費用（円） 契約更新費用（円） 更新間隔（月数） 賃貸費用を計算 入力した条件から見える費用 入居時の現金には家賃・管理費の1か月前払いを含めます。総額では二重計上しません。年払い・更新費用は、その時点を超えて住む場合のみ加算します。敷金返還額は仮定です。 光熱費・引越し費用・未入力の退去費用・日割り家賃・入力欄以外の費用は含みません。これらを含むA/B比較には下記ツールを利用してください。 詳細なA/B賃貸比較（英語） ↗ 入力・結果を保存 国土交通省：賃貸住宅の案内 ↗ 固定金利の試算 購入価格（円） 頭金（円） 年利（％） 返済期間（年） ローン以外の月額費用（円） 頭金以外の初期費用（円） 試算する 入力条件での負担額 毎月返済・固定金利の元利均等返済を想定します。融資の提案・審査予測・投資利回り・税額計算ではありません。管理費・修繕積立金・保険・税金の月割りはご自身で入力してください。変動金利や一時金は別の試算が必要です。 管理費・修繕積立金を比較（英語） ↗ Sources: https://www.mlit.go.jp/jutakukentiku/house/jutakukentiku_house_tk3_000025.html --- # 不動産会社・オーナー・開発事業者向け | property.tokyo Canonical: https://property.tokyo/ja/professionals/ Language: ja Published: 2026-10-09 property.tokyo / 事業者向け TOKYO, WITH CONTEXT 正確な情報から、質の高い問い合わせへ。 東京に特化した連携プログラムを準備しています。公開前に掲載権限・内容・商業条件を個別に確認します。 01 仲介会社・オーナー 空室状況、費用、契約条件、掲載権限を揃えます。 02 開発事業者 プロジェクトの情報、公式資料、引渡し予定、翻訳の根拠を整理します。 03 転居支援・関連サービス 法人住宅、引越し、保証、管理などの連携をご相談ください。 物件データを確認する JSON配列（最大1MB・1,000件）を選択してください。ブラウザ内で形式を確認し、アップロード・公開は行いません。形式の合格は、本人確認や免許確認の完了を意味しません。 物件JSONファイル 空のテンプレートを保存 形式確認済みデータを保存 根拠のある掲載情報へ 提供会社、該当する宅建業免許、確認できる連絡先。 所有者の許可または配信契約と、その確認資料。 円建て価格、支払い期間、面積、正確な区市町村。 募集有効期限と、過去14日以内の確認日。 外国籍の方・ペットの条件は、可・不可・未確認を明示。 連携相談のメールを開く ↗ 現在、有料会員・有料掲載は提供していません。商業条件、法務確認、課金、提供者の確認を整えてから開始します。 Sources: https://www.reinfolib.mlit.go.jp/ --- # 東京の不動産情報：出典と編集方針 | property.tokyo Canonical: https://property.tokyo/ja/data-methodology/ Language: ja Published: 2026-10-09 property.tokyo / 出典・編集方針 TOKYO, WITH CONTEXT 情報からわかること、わからないこと。 東京の住まい選びに使える、確認可能な情報を目指します。提供中の機能と、まだ接続していないサービスを明示します。 地理情報の範囲 東京都は23特別区、26市、5町、8村で構成されています。首都圏とは範囲が異なります。自治体名と町名を混同せず、どこでも同じサービスが使えるとは扱いません。 全62区市町村の名称と公式リンクを収録しています。個別エリア資料は閲覧できますが、独自の地域情報を充実させるまで検索インデックス対象から除外しています。駅名は参考情報で、全駅・経路・所要時間を網羅するデータではありません。 物件情報と掲載権限 募集中の物件データ配信はまだ接続されていません。公開されている物件・写真・間取り・パンフレットでも、転載が自動的に許可されるわけではありません。公開には許可の根拠、出典、確認日、募集期限が必要です。ファイル検証は形式と申告の確認に限られます。 公開データとリスク情報 国土交通省の不動産情報ライブラリは価格・土地利用などの情報を提供します。APIは利用申請が必要で、募集物件の配信ではありません。ハザード情報は対象データ・時点に基づくもので、安全を保証しません。公式地図を参照し、住所単位で専門家に確認してください。 費用・試算・入居条件 計算機の初期値は架空の仮定で、入力し直せます。融資の提案・税務助言・相場調査ではありません。入居審査、外国籍の方の受付、保証条件、バリアフリー対応は、提供者と物件ごとに異なります。未確認の条件は未確認のままにします。 プライバシーと保存情報 エリアと明示的に保存した資料は端末内のローカルストレージに保存します。メール下書きを開いても送信はしません。物件ファイルの検証もブラウザ内です。新しいツールの入力はCRMや解析サービスに送信しません。保存資料の削除、またはブラウザ設定で保存情報を消去できます。 訂正と確認 AIを補助的に使用し、出典を示して編集しています。日本の不動産専門家による独立した確認を完了したとは表明しません。訂正はページURLと一次資料を添えてご連絡ください： joio.design@gmail.com . Tokyo Metropolitan Government ↗ GSI hazard map portal ↗ MLIT Real Estate Information Library ↗ MLIT rental guidance ↗ UR Tokyo ↗ JKK Tokyo ↗ ページ確認日: 2026-10-09 Sources: https://www.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/ https://disaportal.gsi.go.jp/ https://www.reinfolib.mlit.go.jp/ https://www.mlit.go.jp/jutakukentiku/house/jutakukentiku_house_tk3_000025.html https://www.ur-net.go.jp/chintai/kanto/tokyo/ https://www.to-kousya.or.jp/